SWiM Starting with Me

SWiM Starting with Me

A practical approach to promoting corporate and personal ethics.

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Governing by Anger

Yesterday, President Obama indicated he would not support a bill forcing AIG executives to pay a special tax on their bonuses that was being spirited through Congress. His reason was that he did not want to govern by anger. Senators and representatives, having been embarassed by AIG's actions, were trying to "right the wrong" by doing an end run around ethics. Regardless of where you come down on whether AIG execs should have accepted bonuses, the legislature's attempt to take them back is an abuse of power and authority.

I hope that President Obama's stance will send a strong message for discussing the ethics of decision making in government.

Labels: , , , ,

Friday, March 06, 2009

On Supporting the “Sin Industries”

There’s a lot of debate in the investment community about supporting so-called “sin industries” – drugs, pornography, prostitution, gambling, etc. That debate is being played out on a large scale in corporations, funds and the stock market, but what about us? Do we support those industries either knowingly or unintentionally? Are we aware of what companies are represented in our mutual funds? Do we know if any of our retirment investements are supporting companies that promote gambling? Do we use products from companies tied to child labor? Do we purchase tickets from entertainment companies that produce pornography? Benign neglect and innocent ignorance are not ethical choices for us. Repeat this: Starting with me, investing will be more than a financial activity; it will reflect solid ethics and family values. I will start asking more questions. For more tips and information, visit www.swimstartingwithme.com.

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, August 26, 2008

On Interrelational Ethics

Here’s a thorny ethical dilemma: Legalism vs. Grace. Law and order demand that we hold people accountable for their actions. Mercy and forgiveness suggest that we give people a break. Are the two incompatible? Ignoring wrongdoing is a slippery slope, but punishment is not necessarily “justice.”

Consider this: ethics suggests an ongoing, open dialogue about the competing values we see among individuals and societies. To coin a phrase, we need to be about “interrelational ethics.”

Repeat this: Starting with me, morals will be tested in relationship with others. I will be open to the give and take of dialogue.

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

On Determining Truth

Okay, let’s get a little philosophical. When it comes to morality, is there really a “right” and a “wrong?” In our democratic society, we tend to decide everything by majority rule. Are there certain things that ought not be put to a vote? Are there moral absolutes?

These are tough questions. But you must wrestle with the answers. Every time you make a decision, you are basing it on some moral belief. Have you truly examined that belief? I believe there are absolute truths and that belief colors my every action.

Repeat this: Starting with me, the basis for moral decisions will not be taken lightly. I will clearly define my beliefs and behave accordingly.

Labels: , , ,

Saturday, May 10, 2008

On Situational Ethics

The term “situational ethics” suggests that the morality of an act is defined by the situation. One’s actions are either right or wrong depending on the circumstances. This is a philosophical issue way bigger than we can deal with here, but from a practical viewpoint, let me ask you: Are you comfortable with others making decisions involving you on what they think is right in that time and place? Decisions about your money? Your kids? Your faith? Your future? Think about it. It’s a constantly moving target.

Repeat this: Starting with me, the moral base for decisions must be clearly stated. I will not allow people to make decisions based on their perceptions of a situation.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Thursday, May 01, 2008

On Inaction – Ignoring Ethical Issues

“The land of the free and the home of the brave.” It’s no accident that Francis Scott Key linked those two thoughts. Living in freedom requires bravery. There are always those who would attack freedom – from within as well as without. Perhaps one of the most dangerous, insidious attacks on freedom is that of compromising the moral principles that undergird freedom. Bravery requires us to speak up. Ignoring ethical issues in our society contributes to the erosion of freedom.

Repeat this: Starting with me, ethics will be worth defending. I will not keep silent when I see moral principles challenged.

Labels: , ,

Monday, January 28, 2008

On Moral Choices

Did you ever read one of those "stupid criminal" stories? What were they thinking? Well, they weren’t. And much of the time, neither are we. Too often we go through our day without thinking about the consequences of what we are doing or the moral implications of the choices we make. What if we spent a little more time thinking about the outcome of our words before we spoke or whether our actions are morally right before we did things?

Repeat this: Starting with me, words and actions will be preceded by careful thought. I will think about the moral implications of my behavior.

Labels: , ,

Thursday, January 17, 2008

On Making a Difference

"Thousands of starfish washed ashore. A little girl began throwing them into the water so they wouldn’t die. ‘Don’t bother, dear,’ her mother said. ‘There are too many. It won’t make a difference.’ The little girl looked at the one in her hand and then threw it in. ‘It makes a difference to that one.’"

Based on an essay by Loren Eiseley, that story inspires me to believe that we can make a difference. Repeat this: Starting with me, making a difference for even one is a priority. I will take action even when the problem seems too big.

For more tips and information, visit www.swimstartingwithme.com.

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, July 10, 2007

The Ethics of Everyday Decisions - Cash or Credit?

The latest Federal Reserve statistics report a 9.75% increase in credit card debt for the month of May, 2007. An article in the July 10, 2007 St. Paul Pioneer Press had this quote:

David Wyss, chief economist at Standard & Poor's in New York, said some of the surge in credit-card debt reflects the fact that it is getting harder to get home-equity loans with banks tightening up on standards and home values not soaring as they did during the housing boom.

What are the ethical considerations of the decisions we make several times a day on whether to put something on the credit card or not? Here are some thoughts to help define our values in a number of areas. Remember, this web log is not meant to prescribe the right answer, but rather to get you to ask the right questions. Weigh the differing, and even competing values you hold and make decisions for action based on what you hold dear. Ethics is about making informed choices based on the values you and others believe in.

  1. Spending what we don't have
  2. Borrowing against the future to meet today's needs and wants
  3. Determining the difference between "need" vs. "want"
  4. Paying more than what something is worth (through interest)
  5. Placing ourselves in bondage to the banks
  6. Immediate vs. delayed gratification

I'm sure there are others, too, but ponder what you believe in these areas and then ask yourself if your behavior around credit matches up with those beliefs.

Scriptural Insight: The rich rule over the poor, and the borrower is a servant to the lender...Do not be a [person] who strikes hands in pledge or puts up security for debts; if you lack the means to pay, your very bed will be snatched from under you. Proverbs 22:7; 26-27

Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

The Ethics of Everyday Decisions - Exercise

You know what your doctor says about exercise. You probably echo those words when you look in the mirror. Unless you’ve been living under a rock somewhere, you know what the health benefits of regular exercise are.

What about the ethics of exercise? Is whether to exercise or not a moral issue? Ask yourself what your values are around the following statements. Whether you agree or disagree, how does your answer affect yourself or others? (One description of ethics is considering whether an action has a negative or positive effect on self or others.)

Exercise affects my mood and how I feel about myself
Exercise affects my self-image and therefore, how I feel and act around others
Exercise affects my ability to carry out my job duties
Exercise affects my ability to care for my loved ones
Exercise affects what and how much I eat
Exercise affects my use of health care resources
Exercise affects my sexual health
Exercise affects how I carry out my life purpose

These are just some of the ways to think about how exercise may have a negative or positive effect on yourself or others. It is a moral decision. How will you decide?

A Scriptural Perspective: "...but I discipline my body and make it my slave, so that, after I have preached to others, I myself will not be disqualified." 1 Corinthians 9:27

Labels: , , ,

Friday, May 18, 2007

Ethics of Everyday Decisions - Diet

This is part of a series encouraging an examination of everyday decisions from a moral standpoint. How do our everyday actions help or harm ourselves and others? Think about it. For those interested, there is a Scriptural insight relating to the everyday decision, from a Christian standpoint. I welcome responses from those who might be able to offer similar insights from the Koran or other sacred writings. Over the next few months, watch for postings on health decisions, work decisions, environmental decisions, relationship decisions, and...who knows what else?

What constitutes an “ethical” decision? It is considering whether the decision has a negative or positive effect on ourselves or others. What we eat, or more importantly how we eat clearly has an effect on not only our bodies, but it also affects our mental well being, our social interactions, our family and friends, our economic system and, yes, even the cultural fabric of our society.

The effect on our bodies is well documented elsewhere, so just consider that your choice of what to eat is, indeed, a moral decision. While any particular choice about a particular food has little long term effects, we choose to build up or destroy our physical health by our collected decisions around diet. Beyond our physical health, though, the effects are not so obvious. However there is ample evidence that eating decisions are tied to self-image, mood, coping mechanisms, diagnosable emotional disorders, and more.

Dietary decisions, however, go far beyond ourselves. We have all been in situations in which choosing to eat or not to eat something hurt the feelings or offended the sensibilities of others. In certain cultural situations, the choice to eat or not eat certain things can have far reaching effects on our social relationships. Certainly, we see it often within families or in work situations.

Is it a stretch to say our decisions on diet affect our economic system? Hardly. The food industry is driven by consumer choice. Our choices help determine what is sold in our grocery stores and restaurants, what is advertised to our children, what is grown on our farms and what is imported and exported. For example, by choosing to include foods prepared with transfats in our daily or weekly diets ensures that transfats will continue to be used and affect our economy and our nation’s health (and therefore, the economy!).

Finally, dietary choices affect our cultural fabric. Perhaps it is not so much what we eat as how. The decisions we have made to make fast food a bigger and bigger part of our diet has clearly affected what our children eat, how people spend their money, how families cope with busy schedules around mealtimes, etc.

These are only some of the many ways to look at our dietary decisions, but it is enough to challenge us to examine our own decisions in light of how they affect ourselves and others. Decisions about what to eat are, indeed, ethical decisions.

Having established that, consider that each person must work through this decision maze for himself or herself. One person makes that hurts no one while another may make the same decision and cause a great deal of hurt. (This is easiest to see from a personal point of view. One person may eat peppers while the next person would suffer severe heartburn from the same decision). So, judge not, but do be intentional about your own decision making.

A Scriptural Perspective: One man’s faith allows him to eat everything, but another man, whose faith is weak, eats only vegetables. The man who eats everything must not look down on him who does not, and the man who does not eat everything must not condemn the man who does, for God has accepted him. –Romans 14:2-3

Labels: , , , ,