SWiM Starting with Me

SWiM Starting with Me

A practical approach to promoting corporate and personal ethics.

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Governing by Anger

Yesterday, President Obama indicated he would not support a bill forcing AIG executives to pay a special tax on their bonuses that was being spirited through Congress. His reason was that he did not want to govern by anger. Senators and representatives, having been embarassed by AIG's actions, were trying to "right the wrong" by doing an end run around ethics. Regardless of where you come down on whether AIG execs should have accepted bonuses, the legislature's attempt to take them back is an abuse of power and authority.

I hope that President Obama's stance will send a strong message for discussing the ethics of decision making in government.

Labels: , , , ,

Friday, March 13, 2009

Can the Stimulus Package Stimulate Our Ethics?

The biggest challenge facing President Obama and the Congress is not engaging the clutch that will put our economy into gear, but rather engaging the heart and spirit of Americans in putting the stimulus package to work.

Already we are hearing of behind-the-scenes maneuvering by individuals, companies and local governments to put themselves in position to take advantage of the various incentives to advance their own needs. Homeowners who are current with their mortgages are complaining that those who aren't are getting help. A local county has already figured out how to use stimulus money to pay itself back for something it did two years ago. Corporations are scrambling to reinvent themselves to grab up as many stimulus dollars as they can.

The drive to fulfill self-interests will surely outweigh the intentions of creating something for the greater good, unless we begin asking questions; and that is the stuff of ethics.

Does it serve the common good for me to apply for mortgage relief when I really don't need it?
Does it serve the common good for us to simply refill county coffers rather than create new opportunities for employment?
Does it serve the common good to jump from provision of one set of products and services to another just because there is money there?

I know I'm not smart enough to ask all the questions that need to be asked. And I know the questions I have asked are much more complicated than I have presented. But I am smart enough to know that unless we ask the questions and discuss the answers publicly, we will likely miss the very opportunities President Obama and the Congress are trying to create.

Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, February 20, 2009

On Living Your Values in the Workplace

Minnesota has been at the center of a number of thorny issues around living our values in the workplace. Cab drivers refusing to carry people who carry alcohol. A grocery checkout refusing to touch meat packaging, and others. While this is a complicated issue, let me suggest a starting place for you and your values. First, choose a job which by its nature is consistent with your values. Second, within that job try to make reasonable accomodations with your employer for your personal beliefs. Third, be willing to pay a price for those accomodations (Such as working every Saturday while others work your Sundays). Finally, respect others, allowing them to act according to their beliefs. Repeat this: Starting with me, the workplace will be more than a job. It will be a part of who I am and what I believe. For more tips and information, visit www.swimstartingwithme.com.

Labels: , , , , ,

Monday, December 29, 2008

On Doing Whatever it Takes

I polled a number of my clients and associates recently asking them, "What’s the most common ethical dilemma in your industry?" It boiled down to this: "Do whatever it takes to get the job."In some industries it was misrepresenting capabilities. In some it was promising one level of product or service and then switching to a lesser quality or quantity. In some it was low-balling bids and then charging extra for contract details. Many rationalize, “That’s just how you have to play the game.” If that’s true, then you are contributing to unethical (and maybe illegal) practices. Repeat this: Starting with me, quality, honesty and a fair price will be the standard for getting and keeping work. For more tips and information, visit http://www.swimstartingwithme.com.

Labels: , , ,

Sunday, December 21, 2008

On Saying No to Your Own Ambitions

The national conference is in less than a week. There is no way you can get the booth built, write the sales scripts, and prepare the session you’ve agreed to give. You have three customer call backs to do today and a demo that will take up most of tomorrow. Why did you ever agree to do the conference? Now you see nothing but stressful, sleepless nights ahead of you. Just say, “No.” There is a difference between setting stretch goals for yourself and being unrealistic. The former is a challenge. The latter is a lie. Not only does it set you up for failure but it misleads and disappoints the people who depend on you. Repeat this: Starting with me, honest and realistic self-assessment will determine schedules and obligations. For more tips and information, visit http://www.swimstartingwithme.com.

Labels: , , ,

Friday, November 28, 2008

On Saying No to The Boss

The secretary couldn’t take on even one more project. And his immediate supervisor still hasn’t dropped off the month-end correspondence. And yet he knows that two other department heads need some typing done before Monday, too. How is he going to get it all done? You know the end of this story. The secretary will cut corners, work all weekend, grow resentful, and eventually leave the job. Learn to Just say, “No” to the boss. Make a realistic assessment of what you can handle, and then respectfully ask which of the excess projects would the boss like you to push off to next week. The boss will appreciate your professionalism and you’ll save your job. Repeat this: Starting with me, work estimates will be handled with integrity and honesty. For more tips and information, visit http://www.swimstartingwithme.com/.

Labels: , , ,

Saturday, May 10, 2008

On Situational Ethics

The term “situational ethics” suggests that the morality of an act is defined by the situation. One’s actions are either right or wrong depending on the circumstances. This is a philosophical issue way bigger than we can deal with here, but from a practical viewpoint, let me ask you: Are you comfortable with others making decisions involving you on what they think is right in that time and place? Decisions about your money? Your kids? Your faith? Your future? Think about it. It’s a constantly moving target.

Repeat this: Starting with me, the moral base for decisions must be clearly stated. I will not allow people to make decisions based on their perceptions of a situation.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Thursday, May 01, 2008

On Inaction – Ignoring Ethical Issues

“The land of the free and the home of the brave.” It’s no accident that Francis Scott Key linked those two thoughts. Living in freedom requires bravery. There are always those who would attack freedom – from within as well as without. Perhaps one of the most dangerous, insidious attacks on freedom is that of compromising the moral principles that undergird freedom. Bravery requires us to speak up. Ignoring ethical issues in our society contributes to the erosion of freedom.

Repeat this: Starting with me, ethics will be worth defending. I will not keep silent when I see moral principles challenged.

Labels: , ,

Thursday, December 13, 2007

On Rules

Rules. We all have to live by them. But how many of us take responsibility for enforcing the good ones and changing the ineffective ones? Most of us would rather complain. Here’s four words for you. It’s all about purpose. Think carefully about the reason a rule is in place. Then ask if it accomplishes the purpose. If it does, obey it and encourage others to do the same. If it doesn’t, go to someone with authority for the rule, and ask them to talk it over with you. Respectfully suggest a change that would make it more effective. Repeat this: Starting with me, rules will be seen as helpful, not harmful. I will obey all the rules while trying to improve the ineffective ones. For more tips and information, visit www.swimstartingwithme.com.

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, October 16, 2007

The Ethics of Everyday Decisions - Making a joke

Humor is a delightful gift - or a dangerous weapon. Of course, like most things, the morality is not in humor itself, but in how we use it. Given that ethics is the behavioral expression of our beliefs and values, how does our use of humor reflect what we hold dear?

I saw a bumper sticker yesterday which said, "Yes, you can have my gun - bullets first." Look beyond the political reality of differences about gun control and ask yourself a question about the humor used to express this person's opinion that gun control is wrong. Is such a use of humor constructive? Is it meant to open dialogue? We may be willing to give this person the benefit of the doubt and trust that s/he does not really intend to shoot anyone who might support gun control, but in this case, does the humor not actually make a point opposite to that which the person intended?

What about the numerous jokes flying around about political candidates of any party? While humor raises issues, how many of those jokes are just mean-spirited? How many intimidate someone with a different view from expressing any kind of an honest, sincere question? This kind of humor creates a predisposition to ridicule and judgment.

And of course, there is everyone's favorite jokes about marriage, in-laws, etc. While they may be funny, what do they reveal about people who make the jokes? What do they truly believe? What are they communicating to others?

Humor is something most of use without really thinking. Next time you say something that makes people laugh, stop and think if what you said truly reflects what you believe. If it doesn't ask yourself why you made a joke about it. Think about other ways to express your beliefs - even humorous ways - that are consistent with your values.

Let's start using humor in a constructive way. Let's start saying what we really think and believe.

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, August 22, 2007

The Ethics of Everyday Decisions - Election Ads

First off, there is no perfect candidate. Having said that, what are the ethics around picking a candidate? Are there ethics involved in listening to election ads?

The ads would have us believe it to be a clear case of good against evil. At this stage in the election, ethics lies not so much in the candidate you choose, but in the decision-making process you engage in as you listen to the ads, sound bites, debates, etc.

Consider these thoughts:
  1. By definition, an election ad is biased. Don't believe everything you read or hear. Check out the facts through several sources - unbiased ones if you can find them.
  2. Election ads are marketing and advertising rolled into one package. Their purpose is to create a need in the minds of the listener and pitch that candidate as the answer to the need. Stop and think. What is hype? What emotions are they trying to draw out? Do you really want what the ads suggest you want? And if so, is this really the candidate to deliver it?
  3. Election ads are often focused on a position - that is, an either/or, right/wrong view of an issue. But whose right or wrong? Don't allow the ad writers to tell you what is right or wrong, rather, think about the issue for yourself. Examine the values you hold and decide where you come down on the issue. What are your interests, based on your beliefs? You may find that rather than an issue being either/or, it is neither/nor.
  4. Similarly, ads are often focused on a single issue. Any one particular group may be tempted to accept or reject a candidate based on a single issue - like taxes, abortion, defense, etc. But ask yourself if that really matches your total values system. If a candidate promises no increased taxes, how does that square with your value about education or health care?
  5. Finally, as the election gets closer, the ads tend to change into either attacks or defenses. The closer we get to having to decide about the issues, the less the issues are openly examined and debated. Look past the ads to voting records, character, affiliations, etc.

Election ads raise all sorts of ethical dilemmas. This web log is not meant to prescribe the right answer, but rather to get you to ask the right questions. Weigh the differing, and even competing values that are presented and make decisions for action based on what you hold dear. Ethics is about making informed choices based on the values you and others believe in.

Scriptural insights: "One witness is not enough to convict a man accused of any crime or offense he may have committed. A matter mush be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses." Deuteronomy 19:15

"Choose seven men from among you who are known to be full of the Spirit and wisdom." Acts 6:3

Labels: , , , , , ,

Tuesday, July 10, 2007

The Ethics of Everyday Decisions - Cash or Credit?

The latest Federal Reserve statistics report a 9.75% increase in credit card debt for the month of May, 2007. An article in the July 10, 2007 St. Paul Pioneer Press had this quote:

David Wyss, chief economist at Standard & Poor's in New York, said some of the surge in credit-card debt reflects the fact that it is getting harder to get home-equity loans with banks tightening up on standards and home values not soaring as they did during the housing boom.

What are the ethical considerations of the decisions we make several times a day on whether to put something on the credit card or not? Here are some thoughts to help define our values in a number of areas. Remember, this web log is not meant to prescribe the right answer, but rather to get you to ask the right questions. Weigh the differing, and even competing values you hold and make decisions for action based on what you hold dear. Ethics is about making informed choices based on the values you and others believe in.

  1. Spending what we don't have
  2. Borrowing against the future to meet today's needs and wants
  3. Determining the difference between "need" vs. "want"
  4. Paying more than what something is worth (through interest)
  5. Placing ourselves in bondage to the banks
  6. Immediate vs. delayed gratification

I'm sure there are others, too, but ponder what you believe in these areas and then ask yourself if your behavior around credit matches up with those beliefs.

Scriptural Insight: The rich rule over the poor, and the borrower is a servant to the lender...Do not be a [person] who strikes hands in pledge or puts up security for debts; if you lack the means to pay, your very bed will be snatched from under you. Proverbs 22:7; 26-27

Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, June 22, 2007

The Ethics of Everyday Decisions - Watering the Lawn

This is the continuation of a series encouraging an examination of everyday decisions from a moral standpoint. How do our everyday actions help or harm ourselves and others? Think about it. For those interested, there is a Scriptural insight relating to the everyday decision, from a Christian standpoint. I welcome responses from those who might be able to offer similar insights from the Koran or other sacred writings. Over the next few months, watch for postings on health decisions, work decisions, environmental decisions, relationship decisions, and...who knows what else?

This blog series is for the purpose of raising up the moral issues involved in everyday decision making. So what about living in a townhome development or in a municipality whose laws require lawns to be watered and cared for? Even in such a prescribed situation, there are ethical decisions to be made.

What are some of the conflicting values among which decisions have to be made?

  1. Respect for the law
  2. Protecting the scarce resource of water
  3. Being fair to immediate neighbors
  4. Being fair to neighbors living up or downstream in the watershed
  5. Protecting shrinking city green spaces
  6. Use of our own leisure time

While these are clearly not all the issues, you can see the dilemmas that present themselves. Ethics is about making informed choices based on the values you and others hold dear. As in this case, there are almost always conflicting values. Which is more important, the beauty of a city lot or the water supply of a municipality downstream? Which is right, obeying the law or protecting a natural resource? What are the tradeoffs? Can one use less water by mulching around the plants in the lawn, or changing the slope of the yard? How does that affect resources such as income which may be scarce enough to barely afford food? Does one simply accept a law, or get involved with the legislative process to change it to more closely align with one's values?

Neither the questions nor the answers are easy, but not asking and not trying to answer is simply unacceptable. Wrestle with these questions. Raise the issues in neighborhood meetings and e-mail or write your legislators.

The ethics of everyday decisions are just that - everyday decisions. Respond to this post with how you have made your decision.

Scriptural Insight: "I made gardens and parks and planted all kinds of fruit trees in them. I made reservoirs to water groves of flourishing trees...Yet when I surveyed all that my hands had done and what I had toiled to achieve, everything was meaningless, a chasing after the wind; nothing was gained under the sun...Now all has been heard;
here is the conclusion of the matter: Fear God and keep his commandments, for this is the whole duty of man. For God will bring every deed into judgment, including every hidden thing, whether it is good or evil."
- Ecclesiastes 2:5,6,11; 12:13-14

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, June 06, 2007

The Ethics of Everyday Decisions - Driving Fast

Did it ever occur to you that how you drive is a moral decision? Besides the obvious values on human lives (and the possible threat to yourself and others from reckless driving and high speeds) think about this. What is your value on patriotism? What is your value on the environment?

The following data will hopefully get you thinking about how aggressive driving and speeding - yes, even 5 mph over the limit - could affect all of us.

America's independence from foreign oil is certainly affected by the decisions we make as we drive to and from work. There are those who believe the last couple wars America has been involved in are all about oil. Whether or not that's true, don't you think it's worth thinking about before we try to gain an extra couple of minutes on our commute by speeding?

Burning any percent more fuel puts that same percent of CO2 emissions into the atomosphere and consumes that much more of an unrenewable resource.

Finally, if neither of those values move you, think about how you value your own money. Even at the low end of these projections, you could be spending the equivalent $.39 per gallon more just by the choices you make as you drive.

Read these figures and then make a conscious decision. Now live by it.

(Source: www.fueleconomy.gov)
Drive Sensibly
Aggressive driving (speeding, rapid acceleration and braking) wastes gas. It can lower your gas mileage by 33 percent at highway speeds and by 5 percent around town. Sensible driving is also safer for you and others, so you may save more than gas money.

Fuel Economy Benefit:
5-33%
Equivalent Gasoline Savings:
$0.16-$1.06/gallon

Observe the Speed Limit
While each vehicle reaches its optimal fuel economy at a different speed (or range of speeds), gas mileage usually decreases rapidly at speeds above 60 mph.
As a rule of thumb, you can assume that each 5 mph you drive over 60 mph is like paying an additional $0.20 per gallon for gas.
Observing the speed limit is also safer.

Fuel Economy Benefit:
7-23%
Equivalent Gasoline Savings:
$0.23-$0.74/gallon

A Scriptural Perspective: The land is mine and you are but aliens and my tenants. Throughout the country that you hold as a possession, you must provide for the redemption of the land. Lev. 25:23-24.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

The Ethics of Everyday Decisions - Exercise

You know what your doctor says about exercise. You probably echo those words when you look in the mirror. Unless you’ve been living under a rock somewhere, you know what the health benefits of regular exercise are.

What about the ethics of exercise? Is whether to exercise or not a moral issue? Ask yourself what your values are around the following statements. Whether you agree or disagree, how does your answer affect yourself or others? (One description of ethics is considering whether an action has a negative or positive effect on self or others.)

Exercise affects my mood and how I feel about myself
Exercise affects my self-image and therefore, how I feel and act around others
Exercise affects my ability to carry out my job duties
Exercise affects my ability to care for my loved ones
Exercise affects what and how much I eat
Exercise affects my use of health care resources
Exercise affects my sexual health
Exercise affects how I carry out my life purpose

These are just some of the ways to think about how exercise may have a negative or positive effect on yourself or others. It is a moral decision. How will you decide?

A Scriptural Perspective: "...but I discipline my body and make it my slave, so that, after I have preached to others, I myself will not be disqualified." 1 Corinthians 9:27

Labels: , , ,

Friday, May 18, 2007

Ethics of Everyday Decisions - Diet

This is part of a series encouraging an examination of everyday decisions from a moral standpoint. How do our everyday actions help or harm ourselves and others? Think about it. For those interested, there is a Scriptural insight relating to the everyday decision, from a Christian standpoint. I welcome responses from those who might be able to offer similar insights from the Koran or other sacred writings. Over the next few months, watch for postings on health decisions, work decisions, environmental decisions, relationship decisions, and...who knows what else?

What constitutes an “ethical” decision? It is considering whether the decision has a negative or positive effect on ourselves or others. What we eat, or more importantly how we eat clearly has an effect on not only our bodies, but it also affects our mental well being, our social interactions, our family and friends, our economic system and, yes, even the cultural fabric of our society.

The effect on our bodies is well documented elsewhere, so just consider that your choice of what to eat is, indeed, a moral decision. While any particular choice about a particular food has little long term effects, we choose to build up or destroy our physical health by our collected decisions around diet. Beyond our physical health, though, the effects are not so obvious. However there is ample evidence that eating decisions are tied to self-image, mood, coping mechanisms, diagnosable emotional disorders, and more.

Dietary decisions, however, go far beyond ourselves. We have all been in situations in which choosing to eat or not to eat something hurt the feelings or offended the sensibilities of others. In certain cultural situations, the choice to eat or not eat certain things can have far reaching effects on our social relationships. Certainly, we see it often within families or in work situations.

Is it a stretch to say our decisions on diet affect our economic system? Hardly. The food industry is driven by consumer choice. Our choices help determine what is sold in our grocery stores and restaurants, what is advertised to our children, what is grown on our farms and what is imported and exported. For example, by choosing to include foods prepared with transfats in our daily or weekly diets ensures that transfats will continue to be used and affect our economy and our nation’s health (and therefore, the economy!).

Finally, dietary choices affect our cultural fabric. Perhaps it is not so much what we eat as how. The decisions we have made to make fast food a bigger and bigger part of our diet has clearly affected what our children eat, how people spend their money, how families cope with busy schedules around mealtimes, etc.

These are only some of the many ways to look at our dietary decisions, but it is enough to challenge us to examine our own decisions in light of how they affect ourselves and others. Decisions about what to eat are, indeed, ethical decisions.

Having established that, consider that each person must work through this decision maze for himself or herself. One person makes that hurts no one while another may make the same decision and cause a great deal of hurt. (This is easiest to see from a personal point of view. One person may eat peppers while the next person would suffer severe heartburn from the same decision). So, judge not, but do be intentional about your own decision making.

A Scriptural Perspective: One man’s faith allows him to eat everything, but another man, whose faith is weak, eats only vegetables. The man who eats everything must not look down on him who does not, and the man who does not eat everything must not condemn the man who does, for God has accepted him. –Romans 14:2-3

Labels: , , , ,